26th Sunday in Ordinary Time [C]
September 25, 2022
Luke 16:19-31
One of the main characters of Luke is that he tends to be ‘pro-poor’ and harsh towards the rich. This can be easily seen in the various teachings and parables of Jesus in the Gospel of Luke. One of the highlights is the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. Yes, this rich man ended up in a bad place. Now, the question is, “Why was Luke so hard on the rich? Did Luke hate people who have great wealth?”

Let’s take a closer look at today’s parable. Poor Lazarus went to restful place with Abraham, while the rich man went to the place of torment. Yes, the rich man is the villain, and there is no other place for him, but a place of punishment. Certainly, this rich man was punished not because he had enormous wealth, or that he did anything evil. Even though he had great wealth, wore extravagant purple garment, and partied every day, he didn’t lift any finger to help suffering Lazarus. He was in a place of torture because he refused to help his fellow man. The core lesson is that it is not enough to avoid doing evil to others, but we also need to do good to others.
Even more interesting is if we look at the bigger picture of Luke’s Gospel. At first, Luke dedicated his gospel to Theophilus. Who is this Theophilus? We are not entirely sure, but one interesting theory is that Theophilus was a rich man who supported Luke. At that time, production of a book required enormous resources. Papyrus and parchment alone were rare and expensive, not to mention other expenses. Luke may not have been able to fulfill his gospel writing assignment due to a lack of resources, but Theophilus then came to the rescue, so that we now have the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles.
However, despite the tremendous help of Theophilus, the rich guy, Luke did not make his Gospel to please Theophilus. Luke did not write the parable of the rich man going to heaven, or teach, “Blessed are the materially rich, for they will become richer.” Luke still wrote what had to be written, the parable of the rich man who went to the place of fire. The question remains: Why was Luke so bold?
The first reason is that Luke did convey the authentic teaching of Jesus, and for that reason, he could not change it to please some people. However, the second reason is that Luke wanted to wisely point out that Theophilus is the opposite of the rich man in the parable. Unlike a rich man who kept his great fortune to himself and ended up losing everything, Theophilus freely and generously shared his wealth to support the writing of the gospel, and ultimately, he got the most important thing in his life, Jesus Christ.
Through these parables and other teachings of Jesus, Luke constantly reminds us of the dangers and (also function) of worldly riches. Wealth is always a means, and not an end in itself. Failure to see this can endanger our souls. However, when wealth is seen as both a blessing and a means to do good, it can help us grow in holiness. We must learn from the rich man in the parable as well as from Theophilus.
Rome
Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP



