Eucharist and Sacrifice of the Cross

31st Sunday in Ordinary Time

November 3, 2024

Hebrews 7:23-28

Every time we celebrate the Eucharist, we worship God by offering Him the perfect sacrifice. This sacrifice is Jesus Christ, who is truly present in the Eucharist. However, when we read the Letter to the Hebrews, its author writes that Jesus offered Himself on the cross “once and for all” (see Heb 7:27). So, why do we “sacrifice” or even “crucify” Jesus again in the Eucharist? Does this mean we misunderstand our worship?

Firstly, we need to understand the context of the Letter to the Hebrews. The author recognized that in order to worship God, a high priest must offer a sacrifice. Then, the author compares the Israelite high priest from the tribe of Levi with Jesus as the high priest. The Levitical high priest was an ordinary human and, therefore, a sinner. As such, he had to offer sacrifices repeatedly because he continued to fall into sin. Meanwhile, Jesus is truly divine and truly human, without any sin, yet sharing in our human struggles. While the Levitical high priest offered imperfect sacrifices of animals, Jesus gave Himself on the cross as the perfect and most acceptable sacrifice of love. Since the value of His sacrifice on the cross infinitely surpasses the Levitical or any human sacrifice, earthly sacrifices are no longer needed.

However, though Jesus has offered Himself once for all on earth, this does not mean He is inactive in heaven. The same letter to the Hebrews states, “…the heavenly things themselves (the heavenly sanctuary) need better sacrifices than these (earthly sacrifices)” (Heb 9:23). Entering heaven, Jesus does not cease His priestly ministry; rather, He perfects His identity by presenting an endless sacrifice. But how does He offer sacrifice without dying again on the cross? The answer is through a living sacrifice (see Rom 12:1). Jesus presents His own self—His glorious body still bearing the wounds of the cross—as a perfect gift to the Father, but this time, without further death. Since Jesus in heaven and Jesus on the cross are essentially the same, the living sacrifice He offers in heaven has the same infinite value as that on the cross.

Now, let us see what the Catholic Church teaches about the Eucharist as a sacrifice. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says, “When the Church celebrates the Eucharist, she commemorates Christ’s Passover, and it is made present: the sacrifice Christ offered once for all on the cross remains ever present” (CCC 1364). It further states, “The Eucharist is thus a sacrifice because it re-presents (makes present) the sacrifice of the cross, because it is its memorial, and because it applies its fruit” (CCC 1366). But what do these teachings mean?

This means that the Catholic Church understands the Eucharist as our participation in the heavenly liturgy. In the Eucharist, we make present the sacrifice of the cross—not by crucifying Jesus again, but by participating in Jesus’ self-offering in heaven, which holds the same infinite value as His sacrifice on the cross. Only in the Eucharist do we truly worship God and receive the fruits of the cross.

Rome

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Questions for Reflection:

How do we understand the Eucharist? Do we feel the need to participate in the Eucharist? Do we realize that, through the Eucharist, we are participating in heavenly worship? How can we deepen our participation in the Eucharist? What fruits do you receive from the Eucharist? Do you encourage your family and friends to participate in the Eucharist?

The Confession of Bartimaeus

30th Sunday in Ordinary Time [B]

October 27, 2024

Mark 10:46-52

Bartimaeus is a blind man, and his life is full of suffering. The ancient world was a cruel place to live and even merciless for people with disabilities. In some ancient cultures, babies born with physical imperfections were abandoned in the forest or thrown into the ravine. They were cursed and would bring a curse to people around them. If people with disabilities survived childhood, they grew marginalized, bullied and mocked. Bartimaeus was begging, and it was the only option left to survive. The city gates of Jericho were the ideal places because many people would traverse these passages.

However, despite being blind and poor, Bartimaeus was the first to call Jesus the son of David. The title “Son of David” is unique because several important prophecies in the Old Testament point to the Son of David. The famous one is from 2 Samuel 7, which says that God will establish the kingdom of the Son of David forever (v.13). Similar prophecies can also be found in Isaiah 9:6-7 and Jeremiah 23:5-6.

Deep in his heart, Bartimaeus knew that Jesus fulfilled the prophecies that would be the King of Israel forever. Ironically, no other disciples called Jesus with this important title. It takes a blind man to see the truth. Then, Jesus affirmed Bartimaeus’ confession and granted him the miracle of sight. The story ends with Bartimaeus following Jesus. Perhaps this is why Mark was able to write the story of Bartimaeus. He remained a follower of Jesus even after Jesus’ death and resurrection, and his name was known to the early Church.

Bartimaeus is one of the few characters who recognized Jesus’ true identity in the Gospel of Mark. The irony is that these characters are not followers of Jesus. Unclean spirits called Jesus ‘the holy one of God’ (Mr 1:24). The Roman centurion, an enemy of the Jews, acknowledged Jesus as the son of God (15:39). The Syrophoenician woman, a gentile, addressed Jesus as Lord (7:28). The only disciple who recognized Jesus’ true identity was Simon Peter when he confessed Jesus is the Christ or Messiah (8:29). Yet, Peter also failed to understand what he was confessing as Jesus rebuked him for having wrong idea of Jesus’ Messianic identity.

Through Bartimaeus and other characters, Mark gives us an important lesson. Yes, we are followers of Christ. Yes, we are baptized. Yes, we go to the Church every Sunday. Yet, it does not mean we see who Jesus is. We may confess Jesus is God, but do we love Him with all our heart, soul, and strength, or do we worship other gods like money, pleasure, and fame?  We may say that Jesus is Lord and King, but do we live according to the words and commands of our King, or do we just do whatever we want to do? We acclaim Jesus as our Savior, but do we live as someone who is saved and redeemed, or do we remain enslaved by sins?

Though Bartimaeus is physically blind, he has faith that enables him to see who Jesus truly is, and this saves him. We may have healthy physical eyes, but do we have true faith to see Jesus and follow Him?

Rome

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Consecrated Life

28thSunday in Ordinary Time [B]

October 13, 2024

Mark 10:17-30

The Church understands the story of Jesus and the rich man as one of the biblical foundations of vocation to consecrated life. Yet, what is consecrated life? How does this story become an inspiration for us?

The consecrated life is a radical way of life to follow Jesus. In our present time, we quickly recognize these men and women as people who wear religious habits, remain celibate (unmarried), and live inside communities like monasteries or convents. The word ‘consecrate’ here means to be separated or set aside for a particular purpose. The men and women are consecrated because they are ‘separated’ to love God more radically. But why do they have to live this kind of life? To answer this, we need to look closely at the story of Jesus and the rich man.

A man recognized that something fundamental was lacking in his life. When Jesus was coming, his heart knew that Jesus knew the answer. He rushed to Jesus and asked Him how to inherit eternal life. Jesus pointed out the commandments, especially those related to the love of neighbors (do not kill, do not steal, do not bear false witness, and honor your parents). Immediately, the man told Jesus he had been faithful to these laws. Jesus, then, looked at him intently and loved him for his courage to approach Him. Jesus knew that man had never broken the commandments, but he had also not fulfilled the first and most important commandment, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might (Deu 6:5).”

However, Jesus did not just say this truth plainly but rather reformulated it into something more concrete and radical: “You shall love Me (Jesus) with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might!”  This call is radical because it required the man to abandon all that he had and walk with Jesus on His way to the cross. It is radical because Jesus’ invitation goes against the prevalent understanding of that time that to be rich is a sign of God’s blessing (see Deut 28:1–14; Prov 10:22). This is radical because all our time, energy, attention, indeed our lives, are for Jesus.

This man never killed or stole, perhaps went to synagogue every Sabbath, and occasionally went to Jerusalem to offer sacrifices at the Temple. But, deep inside, he was called to love God totally. Yet, when Jesus offered him the opportunity, he shied away because he had many possessions. Will this man be condemned? Indeed, he will not be punished and will remain the inheritor of eternal life. But he also cannot fulfill his deepest desire to love God radically.

In the present time, this radical following of Jesus manifests in men and women who totally give themselves to Jesus and the Church. These men and women do not get married, so their time may be devoted to prayers and service. They work or receive money not to be rich but simply to support their lives and ministry. Finally, they freely give up their freedom to love God and His people. Yet, the Church understands this vocation is not for everyone.

Rome

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Questions for reflections:

Do we love God totally and radically? Do we love God first, or do we love ourselves first? What hinders us from loving God? Money, wealth, professions, fame, hobby, or other things? Are we called into the consecrated life? Are we ready to answer yes to Jesus’ calling?

Sin and God’s Love

26th Sunday in Ordinary Time

September 29, 2024

Mark 9:38-48

Some people do not talk about sin. Some think that sins are no longer relevant in the modern world. The concept is a restriction on human freedom and creativity. Others see it as the Church’s invention to control its faithful, primarily through fear. Those who sin will be punished in hell! Others perceive that to talk about sin is incompatible with God, which is love. For some priests and preachers, the topic even becomes taboo to preach. Yet, this is all a misunderstanding. The proper understanding of sin will bring us a full appreciation of God’s love. Then how must we understand the concept of sin?

Firstly, the basic understanding of sin is a violation of God’s law, and God made His laws not to limit our freedom but rather the opposite. They are to protect us from harm, danger, and disasters. Every violation of God’s law brings catastrophic consequences. It destroys ourselves, others, and the world. Abortion kills innocent babies, destroys the holy vocation of motherhood, and treats sacred women’s bodies as mere tools. Masturbation seems less of a problem since it is something ‘personal’. But masturbation leads to mental health problems as we carve more and more dopamine (pleasure hormone) to satisfy us. Again, this causes us to see other people as mere tools to give us pleasure. By following God’s laws, we are not only avoiding harm in our lives but also walking on the path of happiness.

Secondly, sin is the contradiction of God’s love. God is love, and He loves us beyond our imagination. As divine Lover, He wills the best things happen to us, and He wills us to be united with Him as the only one who can satisfy our infinite desire. However, true love does not coerce and gives freedom to choose and love Him. Robots can obey all our orders, but there is no love since robots do not have freedom. A Labrador can abide by us and give us affectionate dog hugs, but this is not true love but a dog’s instinct to cling to his owner for survival. We have that true freedom. Unfortunately, we abuse our freedom to choose something much lesser than God and, thus, violate His laws. Therefore, sin is a radical choice to turn away from God. Hell is not God’s punishment but rather our decision to be separated from God, our true happiness.

Therefore, reading the Gospel, we immediately recognize that if there is one thing that Jesus hated the most, it is sin. He knows well what sin is and what it does to us humans. Adam and Eve sinned, and they brought the entire human race into a spiral of madness and despair. Jesus came to this world to get forgiveness of sin and to show God’s love on the cross so that we may be moved into repentance. Jesus loves sinners and not their sins in the sense that He wills them to embrace God’s forgiveness.

Therefore, preaching about sin and repentance and praying for sinners participates in Jesus’ mission and God’s love. But if we shy away from preaching repentance and even promote a fallacious concept of sin, we may deserve to be ‘thrown into the sea with miles stone’.

Surabaya

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Questions for reflection:

How do we understand the concept of sin? Do we speak about sins and repentance, or do we try to avoid it? Do we continue to evaluate and correct ourselves? Do we visit the sacrament of confession often? Do we invite others to reflect God’s love and repentance?

Sola Fide and Letter of James

24th Sunday in Ordinary Time [B]

September 15, 2024

James 2:14-18

When Martin Luther separated from the Catholic Church, he began translating the Bible into the native German language. However, he did not only translate but also segregate the books in the Bible. He placed some books in the appendix rather than in usual, and one of those books was The Letter of St. James. He dubbed the letter as ‘the epistle of straw.’  Fortunately, the Christians did not follow his advice and considered the epistle canonical. But why was Luther so eager to remove this letter from the Bible?

The reason Luther saw the letter as a mere straw is that the letter does not fit his theology. In his preface to the New Testament in 1522, he commented that the letter had ‘nothing of the nature of the Gospel about it.’ He judged that the letter contradicted his belief in salvation by faith alone (in Latin, sola fide). One particular verse that opposes the idea of sola fide is Jam 2:24. “You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.”

To understand further what this verse means, we must first understand ‘sola fide.’  Martin Luther believed that man was justified before God by faith alone. When we sin, for Luther, our nature is totally corrupted, and we are destined for hell. Yet, the sacrifice of Jesus hides our broken natures, and we are justified because God did not see us, but Jesus who covers us. What we need to do is to have faith or to believe in God’s promise of salvation through Jesus Christ. Luther denied any work we do, no matter how good they are, would be beneficial for our justification.

Meanwhile, St. James, our Lord’s brother and Jerusalem’s bishop, wrote his letter around 1500 years before Luther. Indeed, he did not mainly write against Luther, yet providentially, he wrote against those with a Luther-like mentality. Aside from addressing some problems in his community, like the discrimination against poor people, especially in the celebration of the Eucharist (2:1-6) and violation of the Ten Commandments (2:6-13, James also criticized some people who had faith in Jesus Christ but neglected the works of charity. Faith based on intellect and conviction is not sufficient for salvation. James taught that saving faith would manifest in love. Here, James agreed with St. Paul as St. Paul wrote, “Only faith working through love (Gal 5:6)”.

Finally, James also taught what Jesus taught to His disciples. In today’s Gospel, Jesus asked His disciples, “Who am I.” Simon Peter correctly answered, “You are Christ.” However, Peter’s confession of faith entails a more fundamental truth. Jesus taught them that they had to carry their crosses to follow Christ. Faith in Jesus entails our cross, that is, the sacrifice of love. It is not enough to let Jesus carry His cross while we sit nicely and watch His sacrifice. We also need to take part in His cross.

The Letter of St. James is another reminder not to pick Bible verses that suit our theology but rather to live according to Jesus’ teachings, which were handed down to the apostles.

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Guide questions:

Do we have faith in God? How do we understand our faith? Do we bring our faith to live in the works of charity? What are the works of charity we do to express our faith? Are we able to explain our faith to people who ask? Do we share our faith? How do we share our faith? Do people get closer to God because of our faith? Or Do people go away from God because of us?

Sola Fide dan Surat Yakobus

Hari Minggu ke-24 dalam Masa Biasa [B]

15 September 2024

Yakobus 2:14-18

Ketika Martin Luther memisahkan diri dari Gereja Katolik, ia mulai menerjemahkan Alkitab ke dalam bahasa asli Jerman. Namun, ia tidak hanya menerjemahkan tetapi juga memilah-milah kitab-kitab dalam Alkitab. Dia menempatkan beberapa kitab di bagian lampiran, bukan di tempat biasanya, dan salah satunya adalah Surat Yakobus. Ia menjuluki surat tersebut sebagai ‘surat jerami’.  Untungnya, orang-orang Kristen pada umumnya tidak mengikuti rekomendasi Luther ini, dan tetap melihat surat itu sebagai kanonik atau bagian dari Kitab Suci. Pertanyaannya: mengapa Luther ingin menghapus surat ini dari Alkitab?

Alasan Luther melihat surat St. Yakobus sebagai ‘jerami’ atau tidak berguna adalah karena surat tersebut tidak sesuai dengan teologinya atau pemikirannya. Dalam kata pengantar untuk terjemahan Perjanjian Baru yang dibuatnya pada tahun 1522, ia berkomentar bahwa surat tersebut ‘tidak memiliki sifat Injili sama sekali’. Ia menilai bahwa surat tersebut bertentangan dengan keyakinannya akan keselamatan hanya melalui iman (dalam bahasa Latin, sola fide). Salah satu ayat yang menentang ide sola fide adalah Yakobus 2:24. “Kamu tahu, bahwa manusia dibenarkan karena perbuatan-perbuatannya dan bukan hanya karena iman.”

Untuk memahami lebih jauh apa yang dimaksud oleh ayat ini, pertama-tama kita harus memahami ‘sola fide’. Martin Luther percaya bahwa manusia dibenarkan di hadapan Allah hanya karena iman. Ketika kita berdosa, bagi Luther, kodrat kita benar-benar hancur, dan kita ditakdirkan untuk masuk neraka. Namun, pengorbanan Yesus di salib menyembunyikan kodrat kita yang rusak ini, dan kita dibenarkan karena Allah tidak melihat kita, tetapi Yesus di salib yang menutupi kebobrokan kita. Yang perlu kita lakukan adalah memiliki iman atau percaya kepada janji keselamatan Allah melalui Yesus Kristus. Luther menyangkal bahwa perbuatan yang kita lakukan, tidak peduli seberapa baik perbuatan itu, akan bermanfaat bagi pembenaran kita.

Sementara itu, Yakobus, saudara Tuhan kita dan juga uskup Yerusalem, menulis suratnya sekitar 1500 tahun sebelum Luther. Memang, ia tidak secara khusus menulis untuk menentang Luther, tetapi secara kebetulan, ia menulis untuk menentang mereka yang memiliki mentalitas seperti Luther. Selain membahas beberapa masalah dalam komunitasnya, seperti diskriminasi terhadap orang miskin, terutama dalam perayaan Ekaristi (2:1-6) dan pelanggaran Sepuluh Perintah Allah (2:6-13), Yakobus juga mengkritik beberapa orang yang mengklaim beriman kepada Yesus Kristus tetapi mengabaikan perbuatan cinta kasih. Iman yang didasarkan pada akal budi dan keyakinan tidaklah cukup untuk keselamatan. Yakobus mengajarkan bahwa iman yang menyelamatkan akan terwujud dalam kasih. Di sini, Yakobus sependapat dengan Santo Paulus yang mengatakan bahwa keselamatan terjadi melalui “iman yang bekerja oleh kasih” (Gal. 5:6).

Akhirnya, Yakobus juga mengajarkan apa yang Yesus ajarkan kepada murid-murid-Nya. Dalam Injil hari ini, Yesus bertanya kepada murid-murid-Nya, “Siapakah Aku?” Simon Petrus dengan tepat menjawab, “Engkau adalah Kristus.” Namun, pengakuan iman Petrus mengandung kebenaran yang lebih mendasar. Yesus mengajarkan bahwa mereka harus memikul salib mereka untuk mengikuti Kristus. Iman kepada Yesus mensyaratkan salib kita, yaitu pengorbanan kasih. Tidaklah cukup membiarkan Yesus memikul salib-Nya sementara kita duduk manis dan menyaksikan pengorbanan-Nya. Kita juga perlu mengambil bagian dalam salib-Nya.

Surat Yakobus adalah pengingat untuk tidak memilih ayat-ayat Alkitab yang sesuai dengan teologi kita, melainkan untuk hidup sesuai dengan ajaran Yesus, yang diturunkan kepada para rasul.

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Pertanyaan-pertanyaan panduan:

Apakah kita beriman kepada Allah? Bagaimana kita memahami iman kita? Apakah kita menghidupi iman kita dalam karya kasih? Apa saja perbuatan kasih yang kita lakukan untuk mengekspresikan iman kita? Apakah kita mampu menjelaskan iman kita kepada orang-orang yang bertanya? Apakah kita membagikan iman kita? Bagaimanakah kita membagikan iman kita? Apakah orang-orang menjadi lebih dekat dengan Allah karena iman kita? Atau Apakah orang-orang menjauh dari Allah karena kita?

Beyond Track Records

19th Sunday in Ordinary Time [B]

August 11, 2024

John 6:41-51

One of the ways to evaluate somebody is by looking at their track records. These records can be positive like their academic achievements, acquired skills, or excellent work experiences, but it can be also negative likes poor performances or engaged in unethical behaviour. Judging someone by their track records are natural and legitimate, but when we treat these tract records as the absolute measure, we may destroy somebody else’s life and future. This what

The reason why many Jews rejected Jesus was not only because His claim that He was the bread of life was outrageous, but also because He was a son of poor carpenter. Certainly, many were struggling with the truth of consuming Jesus’ flesh, some Jews recognized Jesus’ family background and came to believe that it was impossible for a poor carpenter from insignificant village Nazareth to tell the truth.  

However, it is only half of the story. Before Jesus made any stunning claim, Jesus proved Himself to be credible as He performed an extraordinary miracle, feeding more than five thousand people. Yet, some people readily forget that sign because they were not able to abandon their prejudices and surpass their religious preconceptions. Thus, they judged Jesus as either liar or lunatic.

While it is true that track records can speak volumes, it does not mean that a person cannot change. If someone is poor economically, does not mean that he will stay poor forever. We have a lot of stories of billionaires who started from zero, even below zero. J.K. Rowling, Jan Koum, and Steve Jobs to mention few. This truth is even more evident in the life of faith. Sinners and even Christ’s enemies that were touched by the grace and love of God transformed into saints. We have St. Paul who used to persecute early Christians, St. Augustine who used to live sins, and Bl. Bartolo Longo who used to be a satanic priest.

This gives us an important lesson that there is nothing impossible for God, and for those who are open to the grace and love of God. When we deal with difficult persons in our families or communities, do we immediately judge them to be hopeless case, or do we exert more effort to help, listen or at least to pray for them? When we see someone fall into sins, do we condemn them or do we spend more time to correct them, or at least pray for their conversion? When we see ourselves as unworthy of God, do we succumb into despair, or do we pray harder and beg for God’s mercy?

Surabaya

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

The True Miracle

17th Sunday in Ordinary Time

July 28, 2024

John 6:1-15

The miracle of the multiplication of bread is a special one because this miracle is different from other Jesus’ miracles. Yet, what makes it truly unique from other miracles? How does this miracle shape our faith in Jesus?

The first thing we can observe is that this miracle is emerging from Jesus’ initiative. Jesus saw the people following Him,  He recognized their need and then, He came out with a miraculous solution. From this perspective, we can draw beautiful points about our God. He is not God who is far, aloof and only waiting for the people to approach Him and beg something from Him. Our God is a loving God who unfaillingly recognizes our needs and conditions, and even provides our needs even without us asking. God anticipates our necessities and fulfills them even without our realization. This is true and divine love, that is anticipatory, consistent and often overlooked. Do we thank the Lord for every breath we inhale? Are we grateful for the water we drink? Yet, God provides these for us.

However, the second character of this miracle makes it even more remarkable and unique. Before Jesus performed the miracle, He presented the situation to His disciples, and asked them to solve it. Philip immediately reduced the situation into an economic problem, and answered his Master that it was impossible to feed the people without spending massive amounts of money. Fortunately, Andrew recognized Jesus’ intention to test His disciples. He then brought a little but generous boy who offered his bread and fish to Jesus to be shared. Then, the miracle began to unfold.

If we try to compare with other miracles of Jesus, we discover that Jesus wills His disciples and followers to participate in the miracle. In other miracles like healings and exorcism, Jesus did it by Himself. He had no need for any help or participation from His disciples. Yet, when Jesus performed one of the greatest miracles, He wanted His disciples to generously offer what they have, and let Jesus bless their offerings, and so become a blessing for many people.

This is the true beauty of the miracle of multiplication of bread. Indeed, God can easily work without us, as many times He does, but He also chooses to work and perform His miracles through us. And, as we offer what we have and allow God’s grace to operate in us, God perfects us and makes us His miracles to many people. Through this participation, our dignity as children of God is elevated and further glorified.

As a preacher, I offer to the Lord, my time, my intellectual capacity, and my study of Sacred Scriptures, and often, I feel these are not sufficient. But, I pray that every time I preach, the Lord will multiply these tiny resources I have into the spiritual fruits in those who hear. As good parents, we offer our time, energy, and other resources to the Lord as we raise our children. Often, we feel these are not enough, but God blesses us and our children miraculously grow into mature individuals. How do you participate in God’s works and miracles?

Manila

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Featured

Jesus, Our Peace

16th Sunday in Ordinary Time [B]

July 21, 2024

Eph 2:13-18

In his letter to the Ephesians, St. Paul called Jesus ‘He is our peace.’ Yet, why did St. Paul apply this strange title to Jesus? What does it really mean? And, how does this title affect our faith?

To understand Paul, we have to understand also the Old Testament. Afterall, Paul was a member of Pharisees, and thus, not only a zelous but also learned Jew. When St. Paul called Jesus as ‘peace’, he referred to the peace offering of the Jerusalem Temple. The peace offering (in Hebrew, Shalom) is one of sacrifices instructed by the Lord to the Israelites through Moses (see Lev 3). The peace offerings together with other with other sacrifices continued being offered in the time of Jesus and Paul. The ritual sacrifices ceased when the Romans burned down the Temple of Jerusalem in 70 AD, around two decades after Paul’s martyrdom.

As its name suggests, the purpose of this sacrifice is the reconciliation between the Lord, the God of Israel, and the Israelites who have offended the Lord. However, unlike other sacrifices that emphasize on satisfactions of sins and transgressions, like sin offering (chatat) and guilt offering (asham), the peace offering focuses on the result of God’s forgiveness, that is peace. When man offends God because of his sins, man becomes far from God, like an stranger and even enemy. There is enmity between God and man because of sin. There is no peace. However, when the man is forgiven, and his sins are removed, his friendship with God is restored, and there is peace between God and men. This peace causes joy and thanksgiving. The peace offering symbolizes the joy of forgiveness, the thanksgiving of peace achieved.

When St. Paul called Jesus as ‘our peace,’ St. Paul recognized Jesus offered Himself as the peace offering in the cross. Jesus did not only remove our sins, but also reconciled us to the Father. Jesus is the peace because He broke our enmity with God, and brought us back to God in friendship. Only in Jesus, we are at peace with God.

However, peace offering is also a special kind of sacrifice because it is not burnt totally (unlike holocaust sacrifice) but rather being shared also with the priest and the offerers. The fatty parts is burnt because it is for the Lord, some other parts of the animal are for the priests to consume and other parts are for those who offer the sacrifice. Thus, the peace sacrifice is like a meal shared by everyone. The sacrifice becomes the symbol of peace because only people who are at peace with each other can share the same table and food.

However, what is even more remarkable is the Catholic Church has this peace offering. Indeed, our peace offering is the Eucharist. In the Eucharist, Jesus is offered to the God the Father, and then, consumed not only by the priest, but also the faithful who participate in the celebration. Jesus Christ is truly our peace because in the Eucharist, we share the same meal with God.

Valentinus  Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

The Authority to Love

15th Sunday in Ordinary Time

July 14, 2024

Mark 6:7-13

In today’s Gospel, Jesus entrusted His disciples an authority. This authority is composed of several powers like to to cash out demons, to heal the sick, and to preach the repentance. The question to ponder is that why did Jesus hand down this kind authority to His disciples? Why did not Jesus give more useful tools like the power to control people, or power to produce money?

Firstly, from this story, we recognize that Jesus loves His disciples and as a proof of His love, He dares to entrust His authority to frail and sometimes, unreliable men. Jesus did not hoard everything to Himself, but rather share Himself with His disciples so that His disciples may grow, even through failures and weakness.

Secondly, the authority Jesus gave is not something that ends up manipulating people. Indeed, Jesus can possible give the authority to control people’s mind to His discciples, and this power can be extremely useful to draw more people to Jesus instantly. People will do everything for Jesus or for the disciples, but this is not real authority since it will objectify people and nothing but pure manipulation. Yes, Jesus can create an authority to control economy for His disciples, and this can generate enermous wealth for Jesus and His group. However, in the end, wealth control through manipulation is just corruption and greed.

Thirdly, if we look carefully the authority Jesus entrusted to His disciples is the authority to serve and to love. To heal the sick people without asking rewards, to cash out demons that tormented men and women, and to preach repetance for the salvation of souls are powers to bring holiness to people, to draw them closer to God. However, what even remarkable is that this authority to love requires even more love, a love that is miticulous, persistant, anticipatory but hidden. For example,  to preach the repetance, the disciples must walk miles, endure hunger and the sun’s scorge, and prepare what to say. They also had to face the fear of rejection, and eventually be at peace with unsatisfatory results. These are the small and hidden steps to reach the preaching of repetance, and these steps are also acts of love.

We, the disciples of Christ, are given the authority to love. As husbands, we have the authority to love our spouses. As parents, we posses the authority to educate our children. As priests, we are entrusted the authority to serve the people of God. Yet, these authority is even built on the small, hidden yet persistent acts of love. To love their young child, a couple have to endure lack of sleep, prepare and provide baby’s food on proper times, purchase and change the baby’s diapers, and many other small things. And, when the baby grows up, she will probably not appreciate what the parents did for her. What she is aware of is that she is now healthy, secure girl with bright future.

Love is not always grand and sensational, but oftentimes, little, constant and unappreciated. Yet, this kind of love that empowers us to fulfill our missions of life. This is our authority to love.

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP