3^rd Sunday in Ordinary Time [A]

January 25, 2026

Matthew 4:12-23

We are currently journeying through Liturgical Year A, guided by the Gospel of Matthew. A striking feature of this Gospel is the high regard it holds for Simon Peter. But why is this so?

A good example is the account of Peter’s confession (Mt 16:13-20; Par: Mar 8:27-30; Luk 9:18-20). While the other Gospels mention Peter correctly identifying Jesus as the Messiah, only Matthew includes the unique blessing Jesus bestows upon him: the new name “Cephas” (Rock) and the authority of the keys to the Kingdom. Another instance is the story of Jesus walking on the water (Mt 14:22-33). While this event is also recorded by Mark (6.45-52) and John (6.15-21), only Matthew reveals Peter’s miraculous walk on the waves—even if he did take only a few steps before sinking and needing Jesus to save him (Mat 14:22-33).

Why does Matthew paint Peter in such a heroic light? If I may speculate, it is possible that Simon and Matthew were acquainted long before Jesus called them, as both were both from Capernaum. Since the Sea of Galilee was the property of the Roman Empire, fishermen were forced to pay heavy taxes to fish there. We can easily imagine: for years, Simon the Fisherman stood before Matthew the Tax Collector. Simon, smelling of fish and sweat, angrily handing over his hard-earned coins to Matthew, the collaborator, the traitor to his people. There was bad blood between them.

Matthew may have been wealthy, perhaps owning a large estate, but he was likely despised by many—some may have even wanted him dead. Deep down, Matthew likely found no peace, living in constant fear and isolation. So, when Matthew finally stood up to follow Jesus, he was walking into a lion’s den. He wasn’t just leaving his tax booth; he was joining a band of men who had every reason to despise him—especially the fishermen of Galilee.

How did he survive in that group? Why even did Matthew eventually write so highly of Simon? I believe it was because Simon Peter, the leader, chose to forgive him, like Jesus had. Peter must have looked past the history of taxes and extortion and embraced Matthew as a brother. Matthew found not just forgiveness of sins in Jesus, but a genuine friend in Peter. Perhaps Simon even encouraged the other apostles to accept Matthew because Jesus had called him.

In following Christ, Matthew found not only peace and the forgiveness of sins but also genuine friendship and a new family. Thus, the deep respect Matthew shows in his Gospel flows not only from Peter’s role as the leader Jesus appointed but also from their personal friendship.

This theory may only be proven when we meet them in heaven, but the lesson is urgent for us today. Jesus calls us personally, but never to isolation. He calls us into a family.

It is easy to love the Jesus we meet in prayer; it is much harder to love the “Matthew” or the “Peter” sitting next to us in the pew. It is not uncommon for us to fail to love our neighbors, refusing to forgive or welcome them. Perhaps unconsciously, we hold onto resentment, contributing to their decision to leave the Church. Yet, if Peter could embrace the man who once taxed him, surely, we can welcome those we find difficult. Let us not be the reason someone feels unwelcome in the Father’s house.

Rome

Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP

Who is the ‘tax collector’ in my life, the one person in my family, community and Church I find hardest to forgive or welcome? Am I using my religious activities and devotion as a shield to avoid the messy work of loving the people sitting next to me? How do I bring people closer to Jesus?