7th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year A). February 19, 2017 [Matthew 5:38-48]
“Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you, (Mat 5:44)”
Love is not for the fainthearted. It is difficult to love, even those whom we are supposed to love naturally and easily. At times, we feel regret in having committed ourselves in marriage to someone who turns out to be moody, demanding and no longer attractive. Sometimes, we want to kick out our children who become too stubborn and rebellious. Sometimes, we also think that we enter the wrong Congregation or convent.
However, Jesus wants us to go beyond, and even love our enemies. If we have a hard time to love those who are close to our hearts, how is it possible to love our enemies? How are we going to love those who bully us in the office or in the school? Is it viable to be kind to people who spread malicious gossips about us? Why should we be nice to those who have cheated us and even exploited us? Do we need to forgive those who have abused us and left us a permanent traumatic experience?
Though it is extremely difficult to love, even almost impossible, Jesus is not out his mind when He asks us to love our enemies. He knows who we are, away better than we know ourselves. We were created in the Image of God. St. John reminds us that God is love (see 1 John 4:8). Therefore, we were made in the image of love. It is our identity to love, and only in loving, do we find our happiness. Yet, again how do we love people we hate?
When Jesus commands to love, the Gospel deliberately chooses the word ‘agape’ for love. In Greek, Agape is slightly different from the other kinds of love like philia and eros. If philia and eros are the love that is born out of our natural affections for someone, agape basically comes from the power of the will, courage, and freedom. It is easier to love someone when we like them, but we were not created only in the image of philia and eros, we are the image of Agape. We have a built-in ability in us to love even despite the unpleasant and repugnant feelings.
St. Thomas Aquinas put in quite succinctly that ‘to love is to will the good in others’. We do not have to feel good about the person, in order to do good to the person. In the Church’s Tradition, we have various acts of charity and works of mercy, and all of these cannot be simply based on emotions. Many dioceses and parishes in the Philippines are actively helping the rehabilitation of drug-addicts in the communities. Nobody likes junkies, some even want them dead, but why do the Churchmen and women continue to help them, despite criticism? Because Jesus wants us to love them, and it is possible with our freedom to do good to them.
True love is difficult and not for the fainthearted. It demands courage, strength, sacrifice. Yet, without love, what is the point of living? Danny Thomas, an actor, and producer, said, “All of us are born for a reason, but all of us don’t discover why. Success in life has nothing to do with what you gain in life or accomplish for yourself. It’s what you do for others.”
Br. Valentinus Bayuhadi Ruseno, OP



The word ‘Pharisee’ has a rather negative connotation for us. In the Gospels, they are the bad guys. They often argued with Jesus and Jesus challenged their way of life. Even some planned to get rid of Jesus (see Mat 12:14). In our time, the term ‘Pharisaic’ simply means hypocrite.


Matthew chapters 5 to 7 are well known as the Jesus’ sermons in the Mount. The section contains classic teachings and parables of Jesus like Beatitudes, the love for one’s enemy and the golden rule. Before Jesus began his sermon, He was sitting down. This gesture actually symbolizes the teaching authority of Jesus. On the Mount, Jesus was the teacher, and as a good teacher, He would expect people to listen attentively to His words. Thus, before Jesus commenced His sermon, He went up to the Mount to separate Himself from the crowd. Jesus knew that being part of the crowd was practically effortless and usually motivated selfishly: to be cured, to be fed and to be entertained. It could turn out to be very superficial, as a mass of people is drawn to one charismatic and powerful leader like Jesus, yet the moment its need is served or its leader is no longer satisfactory, it would be naturally disbanded.
Jesus began His public ministry by moving to another town in Galilee. From his hometown Nazareth to a bigger and more dense Capernaum. It was an ancient urbanization! Nazareth was small and scarcely populated, while Capernaum was one of the fishing centers in the Sea of Galilee. It was where people came, gathered, and interacted with each other. Had Jesus commenced His mission in Nazareth, probably, it would have taken more time to grow. Capernaum gave critical advantages for Jesus. It was easier to gather people, preach and attract followers. As a port city, it eased up Jesus mobility to other places in Galilee. And, Capernaum provided Jesus with shelter and other resources for His preaching. The reason for migrating was practical and yet decisive.




Today, the world is celebrating its new beginning. Many of us are going to the parties, watching fireworks, and dancing and singing. Surely, nothing is wrong with those. Yet, today, the Church decides to go against the tide and celebrates something else, or someone else: Mary the Mother of God. To make it worse, today is a holiday of obligation, meaning we need to go to the mass whether we like or not. I remember attending the Eucharistic mass on January 1 in my own parish, and the priest never dropped a single greetings of a Happy New Year to the congregation. What a kill-joy!
The story of Nativity of Jesus Christ began with a great person in ancient time. He was Caesar Augustus. He was considered to be one of the greatest Roman Emperors because during his reign, he was able to establish peace and prosperity within his territory. The people adored him and worshiped him as the Savior and the Son of God. He was the hero of the ancient world, but fortunately, he was not the hero of Christmas.
If there is one important person in the life of Jesus, but gets very little attention, this person is no other than Joseph, Jesus’ foster father. He was absent in the Gospel of Mark. In John, he was mentioned only by name. In Luke, his presence was felt, but he was overshadowed by Mary and her unique mission. Only in Matthew, Joseph had a more active role in the beginning of Jesus’ life. Yet, again, he remained a voiceless character, and simply disappeared as Jesus began his mission. Still, Joseph had significantly influenced the life of Jesus.